I eat raw peanuts and snow peas all the time, with no apparent health effects. So do millions of other humans.painman wrote:raw legumes are hazardous to human health.
The operative word there is "can". Raw kidney beans will definitely make you sick, and so will some unprocessed roots, like cassava, which the paleo diet endorses. But you cannot say all raw legumes will make you sick. That's patently incorrect."As with everything in life, too much of a good thing is a bad thing. We have known for over half a century that lentils and beans have the highest levels of lectins and therefore can make us sick if we eat them raw. ["Toxicity of raw kidney beans", Jaffe WG, Experientia 5 (1949) 81]."
I modified that statement. Not sure why you keep harping on it.You originally said a paleo diet is a low carbohydrate diet.
That may be true, but the doyens of paleo diet, like Cordain, claim it to be low GI. E.g. from http://thepaleodiet.com/archives/3789It's not a low Gi diet either. None of the plant foods i mentioned are low GI.
on the same page, Cordain's colleague Ben Balzer states, without Cordain's disagreement:Loren Cordain wrote:Here is a list of references which show cancer to be rare in hunter gatherers and less westernized populations, which typically consume higher protein, low glycemic load, low salt, high n-3, and high fruits and vegetables.
So given that, we can safely assume that the paleo diet is supposed to be low GI and that the high GI foods you mention are not supposed to be eaten in bulk.Ben Balzer wrote:This is because the Paleo diet includes most of the standard features universally accepted as being beneficial in diet= low GI, high omega 3, low omega 6, high in vitamins, high on fibre etc etc.
It's a bit rich for someone of your tender age, without medical training (a nutrition degree is not medical training), to start advising people to avoid complete food groups based on your limited "experience", and without any mainstream studies specifically advising the avoidance of these food groups (e.g. properly cooked legumes).It's very possible and probably likely that some small amount of lectins and other antinutrients remain in the legumes after soaking and cooking, which in susceptible people may cause digestive issues associated with lectin consumption. This has been my clinical experience, especially in people with autoimmune diseases.
Yet you promote eating patterns supported by only a tiny fraction of your nutritionist colleagues, and advise excluding entire food groups based on nothing but theories and a few studies by devotees. I can produce numerous studies showing properly cooked legumes are an important part of a wholesome, nutritious diet. Soybeans form a large part of the diets in Asia, for instance. All you can produce are the fringe studies by Loren Cordain (a person with qualifications in fitness and exercise!) and his ilk.I have a degree in the field of nutrition and have experience in this field working closely with clients dealing with health conditions.
Bottom line for me is that the paleo diet is yet another fad diet of scant interest. It hits a few targets inadvertently, by excluding some problematic foods like gluten and dairy, but the rest of the theory is full of holes.
We don't promote any theory exclusively. If you are referring to the Wise-Anderson Protocol, several studies published in Urology is not "little scientific evidence".I also found your statements to be hypocritical considering that you run a website promoting a theory that has little scientific evidence to support it