I agree with Mastcells. The one thing this board has shown us is that urologists uniformally do not understand CPPS, AT ALL. It would be one thing if half of users on this forum reported good success with their urologists, and the other have didn't. Then, we could at least suggest to someone to find another urologist. But from my general time as a moderator, I'd say the percentage of positive urological consultations is probably LESS THAN 5 PERCENT. That's ridiculous. And it's not a coincidence. Urologists do not understand pelvic myoneuropathy at all, and will just harm most patients who continue to see them for it. The amount of antibiotics the patients are prescribed are just the beginning of story. Just the start. The patients are then subjected to painful procedure after painful procedure, getting cystos, trying more drugs, electrical stimulation, more drugs, prostate massages, more drugs, and for the very unlucky, surgical procedures to move nerves, tissue, or worse.Find a good urologist and trust his judgement.
Urologist should be used to rule out other, more serious conditions. But if you think that they are helpful as a group, and that we should trust their advice, you haven't had the experience of 95% of the sufferers here. I've seen 3 urologists personally, and 2 of them told me "you just have to live with it", and the other told me "it will just get better on it's own". Boy were they wrong. And that's the way it goes for most of us. My physical therapist knew more about this condition than my doctors. They don't know how muscles relate to urological pain. How many ED patients are suffering from pelvic myoneuropathy, bu the doctors just prescribe Viagra? They don't even THINK to suggest that perhaps the person is experiencing lack of blood flow due to tension in the pelvic floor. Crazy. I can't wait until THAT research paper comes out. Then suddenly the SP will become a mainstream treatment.
Doctors are not more knowledgeable than the users of this forum regarding CPPS. We know far more than they do. We explore all the physiology in the region. We share treatment suggestions, and know what works for some people and others. We discuss drug results, side-effects, and even allergies. Many of us have read and re-read Gray's anatomy, and other books on urology. It's amazing how the doctors always seem to stick to the stuff from chapter 1 in those books. Do they read these books passed the first chapter? I just smile when they tell me stuff that was accepted as truth 25 years ago, when all the new urology papers being published are showing the opposite. They are not well versed in current literature. They do not seem to want to learn. They do not seem to care. I personally scored higher in most of my classes in college than any of my friends who became doctors. Why are they more capable of learning than I am?
Perhaps in 25 years, urologists will know what the heck they are talking about with CPPS, but for now, no thank you. I'll trust Dr. Wise, as he doesn't make stuff up.
And for the MD's on this forum who DO get CPPS, you should be commended for going against the grain your fellow doctors seem to tread. Take yourself, and your career seriously, and accept the fact that other people that don't have an MD after their name can teach YOU something as well.
Mike